Using the Delphi Method to Support Effective Market Access For data-driven decision-making in healthcare, structured consensus techniques that gather expert opinions are particularly valuable, especially when data from clinical trials is uncertain or insufficient. Tapping into the knowledge and experience of specialists can provide strong insights to support decision-making in an increasingly complex healthcare…
In the complex field of medicine, the need for clear, evidence-based guidelines is crucial to help healthcare professionals navigate clinical decisions. While randomized controlled trials are considered the gold standard for generating evidence that supports guidelines, they can be unpractical and resource intensive. They also lack the ability to generate evidence for a specific context,…
So you’ve achieved consensus with the Delphi method. What next? The Delphi method, a structured technique for eliciting expert opinions, has emerged as a valuable tool to guide policy in many fields. Increasingly, it is used by the healthcare sector to inform decision-making, particularly when clinical trial research is challenging or limited. Triducive specialises…
Comparing the Delphi Method and the Nominal Group Technique (NGT) for Healthcare Decision-Making In the dynamic and complex landscape of healthcare, decision-making processes are often collaborative and rely heavily on the input of multiple stakeholders. To navigate this complexity, structured techniques for generating consensus are invaluable tools, enabling healthcare professionals, policymakers, and researchers to…
How to conduct a Delphi Consensus Process A Delphi consensus process can be employed to generate expert opinion evidence on a particular topic. It involves sending out a series of questionnaires to gather anonymous expert feedback, each round building on the previous one. Nowadays, many industries including healthcare use the Delphi method to better…
The Pros and Cons of the Delphi Method The use of the Delphi Method The Delphi method is a structured communication technique used to achieve consensus among a group of experts, involving multiple rounds of anonymous questionnaires with controlled feedback. Originally it was developed by the RAND Corporation in the 1950s to gather…
Selecting a Journal to Share Results of a Delphi Method Study One of the objectives in the Medical Affairs plan is to generate evidence and subsequently disseminate it to the target audience, supporting positive changes in healthcare.1 The Delphi method is a promising technique for collecting expert opinions on a given research question.2 Based…
How the Delphi method fits within the Medical Affairs plan Evidence-based healthcare practices exist for the management of a variety of diseases and conditions. Traditionally, the main aim of clinical studies is to improve efficacy and safety results to guarantee the enhanced quality of life and patient outcomes.1 However, variability of approaches in the…
The adoption of a MedTech innovation relies not only on demonstrating positive results from clinical trials, but also heavily on the strategy for positioning within a specific context to enable better patient outcomes. Evidence development is therefore a priority, from the design phase and throughout the life cycle of the product.1 This ensures decisions that…
Can the Delphi method be used to engage with patients? It is well established that the Delphi method can be used to engage clinicians and drive the development of optimal care standards 1–4. By gathering the opinions of a panel of experts over multiple rounds of feedback, the Delphi method allows for consensus building,…