Navigating Complexities in Evidence Generation: How the Delphi Method Generates Quantitative and Qualitative Data In today’s pharmaceutical landscape, professionals in medical affairs and market access are navigating unprecedented challenges. These include aligning clinical evidence with payer requirements, addressing gaps in treatment guidelines, and building robust, stakeholder-accepted frameworks for decision-making. Amid these complexities, generating high-quality evidence…
Using the Delphi Method to Support Effective Market Access For data-driven decision-making in healthcare, structured consensus techniques that gather expert opinions are particularly valuable, especially when data from clinical trials is uncertain or insufficient. Tapping into the knowledge and experience of specialists can provide strong insights to support decision-making in an increasingly complex healthcare…
How is the Delphi Method used to Develop Clinical Guidelines In the complex field of medicine, the need for clear, evidence-based guidelines is crucial to help healthcare professionals navigate clinical decisions. While randomized controlled trials are considered the gold standard for generating evidence that supports clinical guidelines, they can be unpractical and resource intensive. They…
How Do You Maximise Impact of a Delphi Study So you’ve achieved consensus with the Delphi method. What next? The Delphi method, a structured technique for eliciting expert opinions, has emerged as a valuable tool to guide policy in many fields. Increasingly, it is used by the healthcare sector to inform decision-making, particularly when…
What are the Differences between Delphi Method and Nominal Group Technique (ngt) In the dynamic and complex landscape of healthcare, decision-making processes are often collaborative and rely heavily on the input of multiple stakeholders. To navigate this complexity, structured techniques for generating consensus are invaluable tools, enabling healthcare professionals, policymakers, and researchers to arrive…
How to Conduct a Delphi Consensus Process in Healthcare Undertaking a Delphi consensus process to generate expert opinion evidence on a topic can be indispensable when navigating uncertainty. Nowadays, many industries including healthcare use Delphi panels to better understand situations or inform decision-making and policy. There is not a single agreed-upon methodology for a Delphi…
How to Choose a Journal for your Delphi Method Study One of the objectives in the Medical Affairs plan is to generate evidence and subsequently disseminate it to the target audience, supporting positive changes in healthcare.1 The Delphi method is a promising technique for collecting expert opinions on a given research question.2 Based on…
How does the Delphi method fit within the Medical Affairs plan? Evidence-based healthcare practices exist for the management of a variety of diseases and conditions. Traditionally, the main aim of clinical studies is to improve efficacy and safety results to guarantee the enhanced quality of life and patient outcomes.1 However, variability of approaches in…
The adoption of a MedTech innovation relies not only on demonstrating positive results from clinical trials, but also heavily on the strategy for positioning within a specific context to enable better patient outcomes. Evidence development is therefore a priority, from the design phase and throughout the life cycle of the product.1 This ensures decisions that…
Can the Delphi Method be used to Engage with Patients? It is well established that the Delphi method can be used to engage clinicians and drive the development of optimal care standards 1–4. By gathering the opinions of a panel of experts over multiple rounds of feedback, the Delphi method allows for consensus building,…